Walsh PB Extreme Ultra

Wider than Walsh's other models and with a new last and extra cushioning.

3 user reviews of Walsh PB Extreme Ultra See all

Overall reader score

Fireman Paul

If you want comfort instead of performance, then this is not the shoe for you.
But if you want to throw yourself downhill with abandon, charge across streams and leap through bogs, then there is no better shoe Continue reading...

svengali

Worth trying Continue reading...

Stagger

The shoe for anyone serious about running off road. Continue reading...

See all reader reviews...

Voley

Could anyone give me a view on Walsh shoes please.

Do they offer good cushioning??

What sort of runner suits them best (light runner, heavy runner, over pronator, heel striker etc)

Are Walsh ultras better than the normal Walsh?? Whats the difference??

Would a Mudroc be better?? Runs are on muddy trails, not a lot of rock, and little road. Or would a normal trail shoe be best??

Posted: 27/11/2006 at 22:07

Johnny again

Walshes - no cushioning!
Mudrocs better, I've run short sections of road ( a mile or two) with no ill effects.

The grip is not quite as aggressive as the Walshes, but it is pretty good.

Posted: 27/11/2006 at 22:26

AndrewSmith

I would go for the inov 8's I have done 100miles in one go in them and they were fine, I underpronate and am porky so I need cushioned shoes and got on fine with these. I have the Roclite 315's

Posted: 27/11/2006 at 23:09

Voley

Thanks very much, chaps. I had a feeling that Walshs dont offer a great deal of support, they look so thin!!!

Posted: 28/11/2006 at 18:14

See all reader discussions...