Posted: 17/11/2010 at 14:18
Mine are a bit too new to tell. They do look a bit fragile and not that well finished though.
If it's a general problem then it's a big shame as they are great to run in, amazingly light and look good.
Posted: 17/11/2010 at 16:05
Posted: 17/11/2010 at 16:11
Any more reports on the Kinvara? I plan to order some on Monday.
I've tried Newton, btw. Didn't like the cornering or the lug system on the bottom. I'm hoping the Kinvara will give me the feeling the Newton did, i.e. that I'm running in a set of shoes designed for FF striking (as opposed to most shoes, which feel reluctant to FF strike as they're designed for heel). I loved the Newton in a straight line, but my metatarsals really didn't agree with the feel under fast cornering.
Posted: 04/12/2010 at 20:09
Posted: 06/12/2010 at 11:43
read a review that said 200 miles
they be pricey for that milage - I thought about trying them but have not seen any in my size and £85 is a bit steep for a few weeks running.
Posted: 06/12/2010 at 12:45
Confused? I am now... What else is there if you FF strike? The Fast Twitch offer arch support which is something I don't like. Adizero Pro look perfect, but I can't get my feet into the toe-box - and I don't even have wide feet! They move around in most shoes.
This is a nightmare... The whole shoe industry wants you to land heel first.
Will Saucony revise the Kinvara to make it more durable? Maybe it deliberately uses a compound which wears quickly? If you land on the FF, want something more substantial than racing flats, but don't like Newton, they've got you by the nuts, right?
Maybe I should go back to my childhood and get some Green Flash and be done with it!
Posted: 06/12/2010 at 13:06
I'm a 14 stone forefoot / midfoot striker, I have over 150 miles on my Kinvara's and they look virtually new. I'd be surprised if I don't get 400 miles out of them at least. I reckon a pair that's screwed after 120 miles must be a duff pair.
I've used mine for 2 half marathons, several long runs (16 - 18 miles) inc some on trails, loads of shorter tempo stuff and I'll be running my next marathon in them. They do everything superbly, they are incredibly comfy, and are the fastest shoes I've ever had (they leave my Newton's and DS Trainer's for dust).
I'm running half marathons at around 90mins and next marathon goal is 3hrs 10mins. My training is anywhere between 6:30 pace for tempo stuff up to 8:00 pace for long slow runs.
Hope that helps.........
Posted: 09/12/2010 at 14:16
Posted: 09/12/2010 at 14:47
That's v interesting., BP1. In fact Wiggle refunded me straight away, which is just superb, I'm sure all would agree. Nevertheless, I have another pair of Kinvaras, as I'd bought a second pair from another shop as I was so impressed with the first and hadn't realised they were wearing out so quickly. I plan to keep them for racing, but if they do turn out to last well, then that'll be great.
In the meantime, I'm wearing Mizuno Wave Riders. Light, (not as light as Kinvaras) comfy (not as comfy as Kinvaras) and seem very durable. Plus are definitely good for FF strikers.
Posted: 11/01/2011 at 16:45
Posted: 11/02/2011 at 16:37
Aaaarrrghhh! Mizuno Wave Rider 13s were good for 500 miles, but the replacement 14s have, according to the RW review, bloated and put on 70g !! Has anyone tried the Adidas Adizero Bostons ?
Posted: 18/03/2011 at 08:20
Sleek Lemur wrote (see)
I am a waver rider 13 user, who recently got some bostons. They are very nice shoes - comfortable and light. I used them for a 55 mile week, except during my LSR of 16 miles and was getting on with them really well.
But since I did a hill session in them on tuesday I think I have got early signs of plantar faciitis, as my heels have been hurting. And have gone back to using the wave rider 13s for now. I might look at getting the wave precision or asics skyspeed to get a bit more cushioning than the bostons offer, as I don't want to get the wave rider 14s either!
Posted: 18/03/2011 at 15:48
I had the waverider 13's - loved them, reliable and hardwearing. Didn't fancy the waverider 14s so i got the asics ds skyspeed - they are fantastic, very light but without compromising on the cushioning.
I had tried the ds trainer but I'm a neutral runner and the support in the ds trainer wasn't comfortable, the skyspeed are the perfect answer.
Posted: 28/03/2011 at 18:05
Posted: 28/04/2011 at 17:55
Posted: 28/04/2011 at 18:12
Posted: 05/05/2011 at 10:41
Posted: 06/02/2012 at 20:57
Posted: 07/02/2012 at 20:43
Posted: 07/02/2012 at 20:54
Maybe I'm not as light-footed as I thought !
Posted: 07/02/2012 at 20:57
Posted: 07/02/2012 at 21:02
Posted: 08/02/2012 at 15:08
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2014 |