Dear All
to use Pete's phrase, this now appears to be a 'me too' thread and I'm sure this isn't a problem particular to Brooks GTS 8's, or even just Brooks.
Though I doubt it would ever happen - I'd guess the manufacturers of running gear probably give too much financial support to the likes of Runnersworld - I feel it would be a great idea if each month RW did a subsequent review of models reviewed maybe 6 months earlier, with the likes of ourselves contributing via a web page questionnaire. Even if this was only done for the top 3 shoes in each category for each manufacturer. Maybe then each company could concentrate on what's important (a running shoe that works) rather than spending money on releasing new colours (if Tour de France cyclists can ride in pink, I can run in any colour shoe) and updates that simply don't work.
Running shoes are not cheap items and from what's been said on this thread the expense we've gone to has been wasted and more importantly has affected our ability to enjoy the sport / hobby of running.
Bex, well done on your Sports Relief 6 and glad to hear the NB's have got you under the 10 mins.
Pete, I think I'm right in saying that the Pegasus are a neutral shoe, and the Brooks certainly aren't that. Would you not go back to the Pegasus, or were the issues with them too much of a problem? In the future my moto will be 'if it ain't broke........', after my change of manufacturer.
Shad
Posted: 19/03/2008 at 08:51