New Balance 767

Summary | Full Review | Reader Reviews | Gallery | Specs | Discussion
Your score:

Add a review

1 to 5 of 14 reviews
Page:
Paul Elliott 9
Reviewed: 09 March 2009

COMFY AND CUSHIONED

Very stable, well ventilated and very well cushioned
Ever so slightly heavier than my usual daps
Very pleased with these, particularly at discount cost
Score breakdown



Performance:
3.0
Comfort:
4.0
Value:
4.0

Chris Griffiths 2
Reviewed: 05 November 2008

GREAT SHOE WITH GOOD CUSHIONING

Great stability with virtaully no breaking in period. Good wide fittings and zero blistering.
Where can I get another pair from?
Really great especially for heavier runners worried about their knees. Wide fit is a definate plus with those who need a wider shoe.
Score breakdown



Performance:
4.0
Comfort:
5.0
Value:
4.0

j marriott
Reviewed: 01 August 2008

GOOD SHOE

good cushoning, nice wide toe box good grip on/off road
heel cup a bit narrow 7 got blisters from the edge of the insole
good shoe
good value against it dearer options from asiscs,nike,saucony
Score breakdown



Performance:
4.0
Comfort:
3.0
Value:
5.0

Foot_Of_Davros
Reviewed: 29 July 2008

FANTASTIC SHOE

Great cushioning, very comfortable due to superb fit. Zero blistering, and virtually no break in period at all.
Hard to find now!
Brilliant shoe - I'm back onboard with New Balance now. Pretty much half the price of my previous Nirvanas, and without question vastly superior!
Score breakdown



Performance:
5.0
Comfort:
5.0
Value:
5.0

Vince Plosky
Reviewed: 11 May 2008

THEY ARE GOOD

Supportive yet cushioned enough to be comfy.
150 miles of use with no problems yet, even on summertime dry trails.
defo 9/10, especially for the £45 paid for them - also in a wide fit for my fat feet ;)
Score breakdown



Performance:
4.0
Comfort:
4.0
Value:
5.0

1 to 5 of 14 reviews
Page:

RW competitions