All | Articles | Forum | Products | Events | Members
Keywords:
Sort by:

1 to 10 of 351 results
 
New Balance shoes
By Runner's World on 18/06/2002 08:59:13
RW reviews of New Balance shoes, and New Balance contact details

NEW BALANCE320 Firecrest Court, Centre Park, Warrington, Cheshire WA1 1RG; 0800 389 1055; www.newbalance.co.uk2005 MODELSCUSHIONED 1060 844 STABILITY 854 1050 766 718 2004 MODELSCUSHIONED 1023 STABILITY 856 1221 PERFORMANCE TRAINING 834 900 MOTION

New Balance 1122 £80
By Runner's World on 24/01/2003 12:53:33

Weight 442gEvaluation New Balance’s answer to motion control is similar to Brooks: an extremely broad base of support with a highly cushioned forefoot. The 1122 sees the introduction of a new and improved version of New Balance’s Abzorb shock

New Balance 1022 £75
By Runner's World on 24/01/2003 12:55:33

We've reviewed a newer version since we published this.Weight 350gEvaluation The 1021 was a plush, nicely cushioned shoe that appealed to runners who loved a soft ride. It’s replacement, the 1022, is all that and more. New Balance has softened

New Balance 730 £50
By Runner's World on 16/06/2000 15:13:25

-fitting, and a lot of fun – though you’ll feel just how airy the upper is in chill winter air.NEW BALANCE 729 £49.99Weight 291gEvaluation The 729 is one of the most fun-to-wear shoes that New Balance – or anyone – has produced this year. It’s not for heavy

New Balance 855 £70
By Runner's World on 24/01/2003 12:55:33

Weight 420gEvaluation The 850 series has been one of the mainstays in the stability category for several years, but New Balance has improved the new 855 in so many important ways that even more overpronators will be able to wear it. Compared

New Balance 879 £60
By Runner's World on 16/06/2000 15:13:25

version is below.) Even though it has no added medial support, its broad, flat outsole helps keep it stable. A good option for runners who have orthotics designed for a neutral shoe; and fairly light at 336g.NEW BALANCE 878 £59.99Weight 347gSizes (m) 6

New Balance 763 £59.99
By Runner's World on 16/06/2000 15:13:25

This model may still be available on clearance. But we've reviewed a newer version since we published this.Weight 349gEvaluation New Balance seems to be throwing down the gauntlet to other shoe manufacturers with the 763. With so many near

New Balance 2000 £119.99
By Runner's World on 16/06/2000 15:13:25

Weight 406gEvaluation Though the heavy-duty 2000 is an update of the 1700 and looks very similar, it’s a very different shoe. It features New Balance’s new N-Ergy cushioning and stability cartridge in the rearfoot, plus several other changes

Full review: New Balance 870 £60
By Runner's World on 24/01/2003 12:55:33

This model may still be available on clearance. But we've reviewed a newer version since we published this. Weight 346gEvaluation Last year, New Balance showed that it could make good trail shoes after all, with the low-profile, top of the range 904

Full review: New Balance 705 £55
By Runner's World on 24/01/2003 12:57:33

The 705 continues New Balance’s venerable subset of cushioned and protective off-road shoes - the 700 and 800 series. These have always been decent, if not great shoes – relatively heavy, unresponsive and not that grippy in mud. In this respect

Categories

Shoes (121)
General (49)
Kit (39)
Nutrition (14)
Racing (12)
Motivation (11)
Triathlon: Swim (11)
Beginners (10)
Event Editorial (10)
Staying Healthy (10)

Authors

Runner's World (176)
Rob Spedding (8)
Catherine Lee (6)
Jane Hoskyn (6)
Kerry McCarthy (6)
Alison Hamlett (5)
Alice Palmer (4)
Matt Barbour (4)
Bob Cooper (3)

Date Range

Last 7 days (4)
Last month (3)
Last 3 months (5)
Last 6 months (4)
Last 12 months (3)
More than 12 months (332)


Related Searches

nutrition running marathon misc weight motivation fat marathon goal shoe nutrition pre-run cross-training improvement nutrition nutrition recovery wisdom lucozade sport super six shoes nutrition general beginner misc health general forum balance marathon schedule life triathlon racing triathlon training swimming

Search took: 0.015 secs

RW on Twitter

RW Poll

How far would you travel for your dream run?