All | Articles | Forum | Products | Events | Members
Keywords:
Sort by:

1 to 10 of 1,794 results
 
MHR
On 01/11/2009 in forum
What am I not getting

 always running in zone 5. My MHR is 179 (220 - 41) therefore zone 5 is 162bpm and above. My pace is a 10min/mile If this is the case what and where am I going wrong?Many thanks in advance Maybe try and do a proper MHR test rather than using the equation method

MHR
On 20/08/2012 in forum

Having just received a copy of Lore of Running for my birthday I dug out my HRM that I bought some time ago and never really used. It automatically calculates MHR based on DOB, which would leave me at 178. My maximum achieved on a short run (just

MHR 153
On 21/04/2009 in forum

/155 on steady runs. Now i know this is high but there's nothing wrong with me, it's just the way it is.My running partner will average around 30/40 bpm less than me. Nothing wrong with him either. MHR is personal and shouldn't be compared with anyone else

MHR problems
On 27/11/2012 in forum
Puts me in the red all the time

. This was a hill but not eye-popping effort. It leaves me confused about my zones because looking at all of my runs over the past few years my average HR is 144 and my average maximum is 155. What i'm saying is that the MHR of 173 does not leave me much scope

Max Heart Rate (MHR)
On 20/05/2005 in forum

I do a lot of training based upon % of MHR and the standard formula (using age) gives me a value of about 175 i.e. 220 - 45 = 175. Last week I did a half marathon and during the final kick by rate went up to 185 (at which point I wanted to vomit

WHR v MHR
On 24/08/2011 in forum
Which calculation do you use and why?

There appears to be two distinct methods of working out your zones which produce markedly differing numbers. Which one is the VHS and which one is the Betamax of methods? WHR because it takes into account more variation between people. With %MHR

% of MHR guidelines = rubbish?
On 02/10/2008 in forum

Why is it that alot of articles seem to underestimate % MHR for various zones of training and racing? I was reading (I think it was in the mag) that 80%-90% of MHR is "red zone" or racing speed. I ran a 10K on Sunday and was at around 93

Can my MHR be correct?
On 13/04/2006 in forum

RHR is 59. I used the method on the RW site to determine my MHR eg the warm-up then 2 x 3 mins hard effort on a treadmill.To my utter surprise my MHR came out at 222!!! I felt this could not be right so did it again a few days later and got pretty

Help with HR (MHR & RHR)
On 30/07/2009 in forum

I'm using is dodgy.Thanks in advance Its probably because you've "worked out" your MHR, it can be massivly out for some people, as you've found out. I mainly want to know what it should be to run at 85%. It fluctuated a lot on saturday but I did a

Timex HRM with zones calculated on MHR
On 13/01/2007 in forum
How does this compare to zones calculated on WHR

that for e.g. the 60%-70% (106 - 124)zone programmed in the HRM is quite different to the 60%-70% (124 - 137)zone based on my working HR, which is what I had expected on the HRM.How should the zones be calculated ? MHR or WHR ?Has anyone else come across




Search took: 0.058 secs

RW competitions

RW on Twitter

RW Poll

How long does a pair of trainers usually last you?