g Contact: www.brooksrunning.co.uk Full Review: What's new? Brooks has introduced its DNA lightweight cushioning material all along the midsole.We say Renowned as the daddy of control shoes, this is still a force to be reckoned with. But it's a bit
between these shoes and Brooks Adrenaline on my runs and you feel the benefit when changing back to the lighter shoes. Alison Moss: EXCELLENT FOR MID RANGE DISTANCES Strengths: The stability is good up to the mid range distances. Good tread that make even
maximum support. Cons:Softer and slightly more flexible than previous versions, best used by heavier runners and those who need maximum support. Weight (M): 420g Contact: www.brooksrunning.co.uk Full Review: The Beast (or Ariel if it's the women's version
impact with the pavement straight into my joints. I'm only 11st so maybe I not heavy enough for these shoes. I'll be sticking with the Brooks Addictions andy humble: BEASTS ON A BUDGET Strengths: Weaknesses: Overall: VERY GOOD SHOE FOR PEOPLE ON A
Pros: Cons: Weight (M): 353g Weight (W): 285g Contact: www.etonic.com Full Review: What's new? Aimed at the same market as the Brooks Beast, Etonic hasn't changed too much to the original version of this super-supportive shoe. A dual
Full Review: This is the go-to shoe for many neutral runners wanting premium cushioning. The Ghost 3 won RW Editor’s Choice in autumn 2010 and Brooks hasn’t changed the essential makeup of the shoe since. It scored highly both in the lab and with wear
decided it was time to go back to good old Brooks .My very first pair of decent running shoes were the beast .So after a few foot pains it was time for a change.Tried out a pair of Ravennas for approx two months doing time trials /speed work , 10k and half
moderate/severe over-pronator, particularly if "standard" M/C shoes like the Brooks Beast don't appeal. I wear rigid orthotics, and the design of this shoe mimics the orthotics = comfortable running, no MTSS. dib: LIFE SAVERS! Strengths: Motion control
