Jargon-buster - Shoes

All shoe jargon - even the shoe companies' technologies - in plain English


Posted: 11 June 2000

Biomechanically efficient A runner with a foot which follows the natural gait cycle, with no excessive inward or outward rolling. Sometimes called neutral, a foot like this does not need added stability features in a shoe. Also called 'neautral' or 'efficient'.

Blown rubber The lightest, most cushioned and least durable form of rubber used on a shoe’s outsole. It is made by injecting air into the rubber compound.

Carbon rubber A harder, more durable outsole, made from solid rubber with carbon additives.

Cushioned shoe Our term for a shoe without added stability features, for biomechanically neutral runners.

Cushioning The ability of a shoe to absorb the extreme forces of footstrike. Softness varies between shoes. Except at the extremes, there’s no right or wrong, though heavier runners tend to do best with firmer shoes.

Efficient See biomechanically efficient

Flex grooves Indentations moulded into the midsole and outsole to make a shoe more flexible, usually under the ball of the foot.

Flexibility The ability of a shoe’s forefoot to bend under the ball of the foot. If the shoe does not flex easily under your weight, your foot and leg muscles have to work harder, which saps energy and can cause injuries such as shin splints.

Forefoot The broad, front section of the shoe or foot. This is the point from which you propel yourself forward, so the shoe should be protective yet responsive. Some runners land on the fronts of their feet, and need maximum cushioning in the forefoot of their shoes. They’re called, appropriately, forefoot strikers.

Gait cycle The natural movement of the foot against the ground when you walk or run. The rear, outer part of the heel hits the ground first: the foot then rolls forwards and inwards (pronates) as the arch collapses to absorb shock; then it moves onto the inner and front part of the forefoot as the foot stiffens and pushes away from the ground (toe-off).

Heel counter A firm, usually plastic cup that is encased in the upper and surrounds the heel. It helps to provide a good fit and control excessive rearfoot motion.

Heel tab The back of the heel collar, which provides a secure fit and nearly always has a notch cut in the top to prevent irritation of the Achilles tendon.

Insole The foot-shaped insert, usually removable, which sits between your foot and the shoe. Now sometimes called a sockliner.

Last The foot-shaped mould on which the shoe is constructed, the shape of which strongly influences the function of the shoe. The straighter the last, the more stable the shoe. The more curved it is, the faster but more unstable the shoe.

Lateral The outside (little-toe) edge of the shoe.

Lugs Deep rubber tread on the underside of the shoe to provide grip in off-road conditions.

Medial The inside (big-toe and arch) edge of the shoe.

Medial post A firmer density of foam, sometimes with an additional plastic device, inserted into the rear, arch-side section of the midsole to add support to the foot or to control excessive rearfoot motion.

Midfoot The section of the shoe around the arch. Plastic shanks are often built into the midfoot of the shoe under the foot to provide added stability.

Midsole The foam cushioning layer of the shoe between the upper and the outsole. It’s the technical heart of the shoe and contains its primary cushioning and stability features.

Motion control shoe Our term for a shoe with added heavy-duty stability features, for big runners or runners with severe stability problems.

Neutral See biomechanically efficient

Outsole The outer rubber section of the shoe which comes into contact with the ground.

Overpronation Excessive inward rolling of the foot, which prevents normal toe-off and exposes you to a host of injury problems, particularly in the knee.

Over-supination An extremely rare condition in which the foot fails to roll inwards as you run. Instead, it strikes on the outer edge of the foot and continues to roll outwards.

Performance trainer Our term for a light shoe with enough cushioning and stability for some everyday training.

Pronation The inward rolling of the foot which is a natural part of the gait cycle.

Rearfoot The back section of the foot immediately behind the arch which takes the primary force of footstrike.

Responsiveness The ability of your forefoot to feel the ground as you push away from it.

Ride The overall feel of the shoe through the complete gait cycle. In a smooth-riding shoe, the gait feels like one continuous movement rather than impact then forward rolling then push-off.

Stability The ability of a shoe to reduce excessive foot and ankle movement, which can lead to injury throughout the body. Overpronation is the key danger. Simple design elements such as a straight shape, firmer cushioning or a thinner midsole help stability, as do added features such as a medial post (pxx) and midfoot shank (pxx). A runner’s stability needs depend on how unstable their natural running style is.

Stability shoe Our term for a shoe specifically designed to help runners with an unstable gait. Not as extreme as a motion-control shoe, though.

Supination A natural outward rolling of the foot, which is a small part of the gait cycle just before the foot starts to leave the ground.

Toe-box The front part of the fabric upper which surrounds the toes.

Toe-off The final stage of the gait cycle which propels you forward as your foot pushed off from the ground

Upper The fabric section of the shoe that surround the top of the foot and holds the laces.


...And the technologies

3D Ultralyte Reebok’s combined midsole and outsole foam. Light, durable and flexible.

Abzorb New Balance’s rubber cushioning insert.

Adiprene Adidas’s viscous EVA rearfoot cushioning insert. Adiprene+ is springier foam-based forefoot cushioning.

Air Nike’s pressurised cushioning units, in various sizes. Zoom Air is a thinner, more flexible version. Tuned Air contains pairs of plastic hemispheres for stability.

Cantilever Avia’s concave heel unit, designed for cushioning and stability.

Cell Puma’s honeycomb-shaped cushioning technology. E+ Cell replaces most of the midsole;
I-Cell is a smaller insert.

DMX Reebok’s unit of interlinked air-filled pods. The movement of the foot pushes air from pod to pod for cushioning and stability.

DUOCELL Puma's durable cushioning insert made of hexagonal material. Usually positioned under the heel.

Gel Asics’ pads of silicone (or silicone-based) cushioning gel. Comes in various sizes.

GRID Saucony’s cushioning and stability cassette made of Hytrel strands, which are strung like a tennis racquet. 3D and 4D GRID have added stability.

Hexalite Reebok’s most basic cushioning insert. Soft, honeycomb cells.

HRC Saucony’s cushioning foam insert in the forefoot.

HydroFlow Brooks’ cushioning pads, containing silicone oil. HydroFlow ST adds stability.

SKYDEX Pearl Izumi's cushioning insert found in the SyncroGuide and SyncroPace.

Substance 257 Brooks’s high-durability cushioning foam insert.

Wave Mizuno’s large, flexible fan-shaped midsole insert. Different configurations for stability and cushioning. X-Wave has a flat centre ‘sweet spot’.

V1 Mizuno’s forefoot cushioning pad.


Previous article
Asics 2120 Winners

Jargon
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Discuss this article

Have I detected a contradiction in advice within the RW shoe guide? In know your feet it is suggested that Cushioned shoes with flexibility that encourage motion are best for high arches (the under pronator). However, in the Jargon section cushioned shoes are recommended for added stability for the biomechanically Neutral runner. can you clear this up for me, because I'm cofused enough already.
Posted: 06/02/2003 at 21:02

I think the answer is: go to a good specialist running shop and spend some time with them (running around the shop or over a pressure monitor), they'll recommend the right pair of shoes for you with no need to worry about any RW contradictions
Posted: 24/02/2003 at 18:11

Paul - some hopefully useful info for you...

The higher the arch on a foot, the less stable it is, because there is less surface area of the foot in contact with the ground. This means that the foot is less well balanced, and 'wobbles' more than a stable foot; hence it's unstable. This also means that the foot is less efficient at absorbing the reaction force of the ground during the footstrike, as there is less surface area over which the force can be dissipated. This can lead to overuse injuries, particularly to tendons on the outside of the ankle, which are weaker anyway.

The neutral shoe is built on a curved last (or sole, if you like), which ecourages natural pronation; hence they're inappropriate for overpronators. This small degree of natural pronation is the foot's way of increasing contact with the ground, so providing more stability (better balance) and more surface area for impact absorption. This is why neutral shoes are good for someone with very high arches, who may tend to stay on the outside of their foot throughout the footstrike.

Cushioning is primarily designed to absorb impact to protect your foot, which is why racing shoes (which have very little cushioning) are no good for most people over distances much furthter than 10-20k. The cushioning in some shoes is designed to help slow the rate of pronation, which enhances stability, whilst preserving/enhancing the foot's natural motion. A racing shoe with barely any cushioning serves to almost increase any natural instabilties of the foot, so compared with these, a neutral cushioning shoe is providing greater stability for a neutral/supinating foot.

Lastly, as Andy said, an assistant at a specialist running store will spend a lot of time looking at the sttructure of your feet and ankles, plus watching your running style in bare feet to spot any major gait problems. They will then tell you exactly what shoe would suit you and why. They are there to answer all your queries, so don't be afraid to ask lots of questions.

Sorry for going on a bit, but I hope you now feel a little better informed;-)

Good luck,

F.
Posted: 09/03/2003 at 15:27

Apparently i need neutral cushioned shoes with arch support, anyone got any surgestions
Posted: 03/01/2004 at 09:28

NB 764, but dont take my word for it !
Posted: 03/01/2004 at 09:36

I think that Runners World should clarify this information and send a consistent message. I recently started out running again to train for a marathon, and using the RW shoe finder, putting my details in as a heel striker with normal pronation, I was recommended the Gel Kayano 14's. Having bought a pair and running for less than a month in them, I started suffering from ITBS, due, almost certainly, to the fact that these shoes are quite a serious stability shoe for over-pronators.

Now I agree with previous comments that you should go to a proper running shop and try out/get a pair of shoes recommended from some proper tests, this is what I have now done, and got the correct pair of shoes. I acknowledge that this is partly my fault but if runners world are going to offer advice on shoes, they should make sure that it is correct, as people will naturally trust the advice of this website.

Fortunately no lasting damage was done from this injury and I'm nearly recovered (my wallet is still balking at buying two pairs of running shoes in a month though!), but I'd tend to agree with the first poster, this website is trusted by people, especially new starters/returners to running. Like me, others could be caught out by the inaccurate information in at least this one critical place on RW.

J
Posted: 27/10/2008 at 13:05

Maybe they corrected themselves when this was pointed out to them when the message was originally posted bearly 5 years ago!!!!!!
Posted: 27/10/2008 at 13:55

Er, yeah, but they didn't, which makes it even worse... This wasn't supposed to be a bump, it is still relevant and you obviously didn't read my whole post so stop trying to newb bash, the information is still incorrect... 5 years later
Posted: 27/10/2008 at 14:44

vince - chill mate - ff is only pointing out something that may be relevant!

and as it is - I tried the shoe guide having read your post and the only way I could come up with Kayano's from a starting point of

everyday shoe/heelstrike/no orthotics

was then to include some element of stability - and even then the Kayano's were only in some results.

how did you get to Kayano's??

and - before you then bought the Kayano's do you do any more research on the shoe like visiting the Asics website???

and at the end of the day, these guides will always have limitations with what results they can supply.

Posted: 27/10/2008 at 14:48

I've sent an email to runners world about this, basically this article:

http://www.runnersworld.co.uk/news/article.asp?UAN=481

Which (incorrectly) states that a normal foot requires a stability shoe, combined with putting the following criteria into the shoe finder:

An everyday road shoe
Heel striker
Does not wear orthotics
Equal stability and cushioning (taken from the prev article)
High mileage protective workhorse

Gives the Kayano 14's as a search result, I don't think it's the shoe finder that is incorrect, but combined with the previous article, results in erroneous shoe advice.

Like I said, I should have been more diligent in my search for shoes but the information on the "Choosing a Shoe: The Very Basics" above would seem to be rather poor still, and potentially misleading.

Apologies for going off the handle a bit, I suppose I didn't explain myself so clearly.

J
Posted: 27/10/2008 at 14:57

yep - it does appear to contradict itself by saying

doesn't need a motion control shoe

and then suggesting

stability shoes with moderate control features

I was poorly fitted with stability shoes when I started running but that was based on an out of date premise that heavy runners (I'm 16 stone) need stability - it's bollox as weight has nowt to do with your running gait and it's often cushioning they need more than stability.

but perhaps you have learnt a valuable lesson - don't believe everything you read in the press or on a website!! undoubtedly - as you have now found - the best advice usually comes from specialists.

just go and enjoy your running now you have some decent shoes

Posted: 27/10/2008 at 15:13

Ta, will do, I think the best thing that RW could do would be to add a comment to the shoe finder strongly suggesting going to a professional shop to be fitted for a shoe.

Hopefully RW will take on board what I've said in my email to them and change the article, until this happened to me I never realized quite what a difference the shoe you wear can make...



Posted: 27/10/2008 at 15:18


Nam
I would never buy a shoe as a result of some online questionaire jobbie because gait is much more complex than that...  There are plenty of flat footed people who don't pronate, some people pronate and supinate (but don't know it) etc etc.  All these online thingies do is make suggestions for potentially appropriate shoes based on the information given.  It's then your responsibility to get yourself to a shop and try them in real life.
Posted: 27/10/2008 at 15:28

Sorry if you thought I was newbee bashing Vince coz I wasn't. I think that when you first come on the forum the default setting is to have the oldest post first. It's sometimes best to change the setting to newest post first.
Posted: 27/10/2008 at 15:41

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member

Smart Coach
Free, fully-personalized training plans, designed to suit your racing goals and your lifestyle.